|
The Shack; huge help or subtle heresy
In a mass-media multi-media age the opportunities to learn from a wide variety of different sources are immense. However in terms of our doctrines and theology are we drinking from polluted wells? In The Shack God is personified as an African-American earth mother.
by Watchman
In the world of popular print the latest runaway success – in terms of uptake and income – is an allegorical novel entitled ‘The Shack’. The title has been around a couple of years now and in that time it has followed on the heels of Rick Warren’s ‘Purpose Driven’ books which themselves have enjoyed the same mass following as the 'Left Behind' Series and Hal Lindsey’s 'Late Great Planet Earth'.
And alongside this growth in Christian novels aiming (claiming) to convey Christian truths there have been parallel trends which too might be viewed with some concern.
The Bible going out of fashion?
Some years ago a local church pastor observed that many of his congregation left their Bibles behind on a shelf in the church between one Sunday and the next. Of course he realised that his flock might be using other copies of God’s word which were kept at home, but he suspected that this was not the case. Indeed he was much concerned that Christians seemed to be coming increasingly loathe to read anything of any substance. If it was on a ‘heavy’ topic running over more than one or two pages, they didn’t want to know. Meanwhile lightweight paperbacks were (this was in pre-Amazon days) flying off the shelves of the neighbouring Christian bookshop. ‘Christianity Lite’ seemed to be where the market was going. The Bible was perhaps just ‘too much work’.
New age, new doctrines, new media
Meanwhile the New Age (launched publicly back in the 1970s) has been increasingly infiltrating the public sphere, the political realm and our educational systems. And alongside this we have seen the explosive growth in (satellite) Christian TV channels and programmes of highly-variable quality – some gems amongst much deceptive dross. [Ed note: See Truth, Error and Deception] And with the growth of internet shopping (including books) the pressures are most definitely increasing on Christian books shops to stock and sell whatever is selling. In some cases discretion and judgment are being cast to the wind. Sifting all these developments and trends together we find a mosaic of spirituality sitting amidst multi-media formats and channels/means of distribution.
A dumbed-down and distorted Christianity
The tendency has been to produce a generation of Christians (young and old) whose doctrines might be defined more by popular fiction – in turn driven more by commercial motives – than an overarching need to define, convey and preserve God’s Truth.
Christians are now doing even doing ‘Bible’ studies on novels and church-growth philosophies. The Shack – a fiction embodying profound truth or very subtle deception? There are terabytes of eulogies on the web and much written elsewhere about the Shack; and the book itself has achieved cult status, topping the best-sellers lists – not least because of the carefully written (consumer/network marketing) advice contained as appendices within the book.
As I have only managed to skim-read the book – albeit cover to cover, I would prefer (for the moment at least) just to provide links to a range of different opinions on the Shack. (And a ringing commendation from the Evangelical Alliance adds greatly to either the book’s credentials or, alternatively, illustrates the profound levels of deception around the place.) However the 'feel' of the book is that it sends out a highly-emotive 'pull' which tends to deaden the readers critical (discerning) faculties. This book– if it is to be read at all – should be approached with ones 'Berean' sensors on high alert. And for the (spiritually) young or emotionally vulnerable Christian there should be a 'Highly Dangerous' rating applied. Needless to say for the reader with no knowledge of Christian doctrine, the picture painted of the Trinity is of 'pie in the sky when you die' variety.
The key questions are who and what can we trust; and are we prepared to ‘be Bereans’ – mining the riches of God’s word; or are we content to surf the candyfloss world of easy-reads with all the attendant risks involved?
---------------------
(Anon) --------------------
Shack Reviews
The Shack, a review by Tim Challies
The Shack; a Recommendation and Review by InternetMonk
The Shack: the new Pilgrim’s Progress? by David Robertson, St Peter’s Church, Dundee
The Shack, a review by the Evangelical Alliance
The Shack, an initial (lengthy) review by James B DeYoung
Revisiting the Shack, a (shorter) subsequent review by James B DeYoung
Ed footnote: The advice printed at the back of the book urge readers to promote the novel every which way; and provides a list of instructions and some of the tools to do so.
A positive interpretation of this might argue that the author/publishers are making every effort to evangelise using the book as a tool in that process. A different view might suggest that Christians are (unwittingly) absorbing lies themselves, and spending their money to further disseminate the errors, whilst also making megabucks for the author/publishers.
Meanwhile a non-Christian but 'spiritual' viewer of the most recent Harry Potter film has described the latter as 'very dark'. Meanwhile the Roman Catholic Church seems to be double-minded about the genre. (See view in 2005 and alternative view in 2009.)
|
Watchman, 15/07/2009 |
|
| | Guest (Guest) | 21/07/2009, 13:22 | | I wonder if people are aware that the author of 'The Shack ' has been written by a self-professing Universalist- who has no Christian commitment or persoanl realtionship with Christ at all. He simply believes that 'all roads lead to Rome..' ie: it doesn't really matter what we believe or how we come to God. It is also of interest that he states on the website that he was brought up surrounded by the occult; witchcraft; annimism and such like in Papua New Guinea where his parents were missionaries; the effects of which still have some hold over him today !
It concerns me greatly that the Christian Church today seems so void of Holy Ghost discernment and are so gullible to this sort of non-biblical; heretical and dangerous reading.
Where are the Christians today who are willing to spend time before God and to find out what He is saying and what is on His heart ? The Holy Ghost will never reveal one thing to one person and the opposite to another. He is always consistent. Neither will He show us anything that is contradictory to His Word and will always reveal the things of God to us - if we are willing to spend the time; to listen and to obey.Jesus so oftens says to us ' he that hath ears to hear, let him hear ' Sadly, too many seem to choose a 'quick fix ' even if it means turning our back on His Gospel and His way of Salvation.
| | | Peter Carr | 21/07/2009, 13:33 | | I for one who have read The Shack, and who is well versed in God's word, am not going to allow myself to be judged by others. In seeking God and His will my route will always be in God's word, by His Spirit and in prayer.
None of this will deter me from being willing to engage with the view of others, even if I do not agree with them. As stated above;
3. As theologians (all Christians are theologians), I believe that we have a duty and a responsibility to engage with the thoughts of others, even if we do not agree with them.
So, although it would not have been my first choice in reading, I am glad with hindsight that I took the plunge (with a little nudge from family and friends)!
| | | The Editor | 21/07/2009, 14:51 | | Note to Guest: Please identify yourself - even with a first name (as it makes it difficult otherwise for others to respond to you.
On a different note, it will be more helpful to others if posters give their opinions on the book rather than just to say that they have read it.
Pastoral advice is what is required re the content.
| | Gill (Guest) | 21/07/2009, 18:22 | | An apology to the Editor - the 'mystery guest' was me ! I hope that giving you my name may help anybody who wishes to respond to what I have said. I'm only a very insignificant nobody - but do feel that sometimes it is important to make a stand openly to all the more than questionable reading that seems to pervade our Christian bookshops today and compromise with God's Word and the truth that He longs to reveal to us.It is certainly questionable how an active universalist and someone who has deliberately turned his back on the Gospel; has no personal relationship with the Lord Jesus Christ as well as continuing to be influenced and affected by the occult; witchcraft etc can be taken seriously when it comes to Christian theology and the Christian Life.
| | | The Editor | 21/07/2009, 21:12 | | Thanks Gill. As you rightly point out there is only one Holy Spirit (who speaks with one voice); and your views are as valid as any other believer in seeking to know what the Spirit is saying to the church(es).
| | | Rosemary Cameron | 21/07/2009, 21:13 | | I haven't read the Shack so cannot comment on it however on the more general topic of Christianity Lite my testimony is of being convicted several years ago of reading christian books more than I read the bible. I promptly stopped keeping the mail order section of a well known christian bookstore in business! Since then I have been very concerned when I hear of churches studying other books in what is supposed to be their bible study. I don't mind studying the bible with the aid of a book (eg a study guide). I do object to studying a book other than the bible in a church bible study meeting. I still occasionally read christian books but not to the extent of eclipsing my bible study. (The danger now is that I spend more time on christian internet sites than I do reading the bible!)
I would read the Shack (and may still do) if I felt that those around me were reading it because I'd like to be able to talk about it with them, and talk knowledgeably. I read Harry Potter and Philip Pullman some years ago for that reason. I agree with the Editor that when reading a book in this way, one has to be very wary!
| | | Eddie Hallahan | 28/07/2009, 23:38 | | I read the Shack last week and I quite enjoyed it.
After reading it I would say that I class it as a parable that illustrates the very real truth that God wants a Father-Son relationship with people.
Is it a complete theology, no. But parables never are - they are always used to emphasise a particular aspect of God.
The Shack will I believe help a great many people realise that God loves them which is no bad thing. It is not however any sort of replacement for reading the Bible, although people who would never have read the Bible in a million years may do so after reading the Shack
| | | John Parker (Guest) | 29/07/2009, 10:06 | | The trouble with much of modern Christian programmes, books, etc is that they present a half-truth. God is a God of love [and wants us to know Him], but that is not the only side to His character. He also hates sin [and we need to be made aware of our need and to come to repentance over it].
I quote: -
"In his masterful little book, 'Is John 3:16 the gospel ?' David Pawson blows a hole in a widely accepted premise. How often do you suppose the love of God is spoken of in the Bible? Most would say, it is spoken of everywhere. Truth to tell, mere are only thirty five verses which directly and explicitly refer to the love of God. That is thirty five out of a total of thirty five thousand verses! Fact. Another surprise is that every single reference to God's love is addressed to God's children: either Israel or Christians. Fact. Neither Jesus nor the apostles ever spoke about God's love when addressing non-believers. Fact. The book of Acts, which lays the foundation for biblical evangelism, contains not a single reference to the love of God. Fact. So David Pawson concludes that talking about the love of God to nonbelievers is a classic example of something Jesus told us not to do."
| | | Andy (Guest) | 02/08/2009, 23:04 | | I read the shack and found it very refreshing. It really breaks the mould of a God who sits on a cloud throwing bolts of lightning down on grovelling Christians who make the slightest mistake. I expect lots of religious crackpops will be shouting "hell and damnation" but Jesus' message was love as well. We all think God is a male, sexuality is a human thing, He has no sex He is neither man nor woman but He is also both. Everyone likes to quote and counter-quote their favourate bible verses(usually out of context)against this book but the overall theme of it is love, forgiveness and reconciliation....wasn't that Jesus' message too ??
| | | The Editor | 05/08/2009, 20:54 | | A South African believer has sent the following message - ---------*quote*---------
Hi,
My name is John Langemann. I am from Cape Town, South Africa and have written a book entitled "Beware the Shack". I have taken the liberty of attaching a PDF version of the book to this e-mail. I also have a web-site entitled www.bewaretheshack.com
Best wishes,
John Langemann
*---------ends----------*
Ed footnote: A resume of the aforemention book can be obtained at - http://www.bewaretheshack.com/article.html
|
(page
1
2)
|
|
|