Christian Life 

A gay minister for Queen's Cross Church


Queens Cross churchCHURCH of Scotland leaders have approved the controversial appointment of a gay minister at an Aberdeen church despite opposition from conservative members who do not approve of his lifestyle, it has emerged.

The city’s presbytery voted 60-24 to instal the Rev Scott Rennie at Queen’s Cross Church. However, sources within the Kirk say it is highly likely that critics will lodge an appeal to block the move within the next 10 days.

The Church of Scotland General Assembly, which is divided over civil partnerships, would then make the final decision in May.

Mr Rennie is currently minister at Brechin Cathedral in Angus, where he has worked since 1999. Separated from his wife with whom he has a young daughter, he shares the manse with another man.

The Church of Scotland said Mr Rennie was widely recognised as an “enthusiastic and gifted preacher”. And Prof Trevor Salmon, joint session clerk at Queen’s Cross, said: “This appointment was given a resounding endorsement by the kirk session and congregation. “We believe Scott Rennie has the qualities to build upon the tradition of excellent ministry that has been a hallmark of Queen’s Cross worship for many years.”   Read on in the Press and Journal...

  

Meanwhile, within the Church of Scotland nationally, a group of evangelicals (Bible-believers) have been at work visibly and behind the scenes in an attempt to combat spiritual declension within the Kirk. Rev. Ian Watson is one of the Steering Group of Forward Together and on his personal blog he has commented (January 8): "The evangelicals in Aberdeen argued against sustaining the call. It's not going too far to call this [proposed appointment] schismatic."

An appeal against Aberdeen Presbytery's decision is now being considered; and, if the appeal (or a 'petition') goes through, the matter will duly come before the General Assembly in May. Watson also comments: "Make no mistake, this issue has the potential to wreck the Church of Scotland." At the time of writing, no official statement was available from Forward Together. [A notice has since appeared on the FT web site which includes the observation: "This has caused enormous tremors throughout the Church as it is aggressively taking the debate on homosexuality onto a new level."]

 

Footnotes:

Rev. Graeme Longmuir has reported in the press: "Almost three-quarters [60 - 24 Ed.] of those voting in favour of the Rev. Scott Rennie's call to Queen's Cross Church."


Rev. Rennie was born and raised in Bucksburn in Aberdeen. He served as assistant at Queen’s Cross church before winning the Scots Fellowship to study for a masters in sacred theology at Union Theological Seminary in New York City: he later returned to the UK in 1999 when he was called to be minister at the cathedral.
He is on the Church of Scotland’s taskforce on human sexuality and is treasurer of OneKirk—a network of ministers and members of the Church of Scotland working for an inclusive, progressive church. He is working towards a doctor of ministry degree at Aberdeen University and Pittsburgh Theological Seminary in Pennsylvania.


In the Church of Scotland tradition (and similar arrangements apply in the other presbyterian denominations in Scotland) a local congregation 'calls' a minister. This call is then ratified by the local presbytery which is a geographically-defined gathering of every minister (active and retired) and a representative elder from every local congregation within the presbytery boundaries. The mechanisms are designed to be consensual and collegiate; in practice the usual resort, at local and national level, is to a vote.
Whilst a minister is 'called' by a local congregation, he (or she) is installed and can be deposed only by the incumbent's presbytery.

----------------------------

Comment


General Assembly HallThe Church of Scotland, as a corporate body, has fought hard to evade the above issue - one over which many other denominations are also currently being exercised.

Back in 2000, the embryonic Scottish Parliament was severly tested and the nation as a whole was aflame over the issue of how and whether homosexuality would be taught to school children.
In customary fashion during the May of that year, the Church of Scotland held its annual General Assembly in Edinburgh.  Whilst this annual convocation was once described as 'the nearest thing that Scotland has to a Parliament', the yearly gathering has fallen in esteem, and no longer attracts the same public and media attention as once it did. However in that year, many in Scotland stood on tiptoe and strained their ears to hear what the General Assembly would say on the very important issue. But sadly, when eventually some sound was heard, it struggled out of the Assembly Hall as a confused and muffled note. Accordingly, the Kirk was seen  as 'tried and found wanting' - and the people of Scotland were failed - by the body which purports to be 'the national church'.

 

Decision time

However, God has a concern for us and His church, and He cannot abide waywardness. About two thousand seven hundred years ago He said through the prophet Amos: "Behold I am about to put a plumb line In the midst of My people...." He was setting His righteous standard into their midst. And as any builder or surveyor knows, there are not 'degrees of plumbness': a structure is either vertical or it's not.


Yet the Church of Scotland, and not just the Church of Scotland, has been ducking and weaving to avoid confronting the issue; and prevarication, obfuscation and procrastination have been the order of the day. But the God of the church of Jesus Christ is perhaps bringing these denominations to a point of decision. Moses called for a definitive response: "I have set before you life and death". So choose life that you may live". Joshua also laid it on the line: "Choose you this day whom you will serve." And he made his personal choice clear. Later the prophet Elijah rebuked the people of God: "How long will you hesitate between two opinions?"

The proverb states: "Where there is no vision, the people cast of restraint." Where there is no leadership, every man does what is right in his own eyes. And when those who are charged with tending the flock lack assurance and courage, then the sheep become unsettled and are vulnerable to all manner of prey.

 

So the nation needs an answer. The condition we are in is dire, but the root of the problem and the basic remedy is neither socio-political nor economic: it is spiritual. And the nation - in the pew and in the street - is being denied clear spiritual direction.

 

The issue is fundamental; and there are consequences

 

If the issue were of minor import then the tragedy would not be what it is. However the matter of right sexual relationships is fundamental to God's creational order for the family, representing as it does the basic building block on which all societies, if they aspire to be healthy, depend. The devil knows this, and what we are seeing is a diabolical, enduring and insidious attack on God's fundamental principles for wholesome living.

 

And we need to remember that God will not contend for ever with us - neither with individuals, nations nor denominations. Ultimately He will give us over to the consequences of our rebellious hearts. This is what Paul wrote about to the church in Rome:

 

For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened.
Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles.
Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another.

Rom 1:21-24

 

Payer needed

Rev. Watson rounds off his blog entry: "Pray for the Church of Scotland. Is God finished with her? "  The question assuredly is not merely rhetorical.

Pray also for Forward Together. The group's response to this (and other critical issues) will test its mettle; and the situation provides opportunity to show real leadership in this 'vacancy' of clear biblical standards in Aberdeen presbytery; and certainly in and from the national church. Pray also for the many biblically-faithful men and women in the Kirk - in pulpit and pew.


Even outwith the C of S some have expressed the view that if revival is to come to Scotland, it will be through the national church. Who knows? Certainly if some calamity were to strike the nation, it would be to their local parish church that many unchurched people people would turn.

However, others see too much emphasis and far too much drain of effort being put into maintaining denominational and ecclesiastical structures, rather than on faithfully defending and proclaiming God's word - irrespective of the consequences for denominational cohesion.


-------

 

Perhaps in an allusion to the dynamic in Amos' day,  Derek Prince who, in his lifetime, was an international and highly-respected Bible teacher once remarked:

quote

"If God wishes to revive the church, he first of all electrifies the fence."


What he meant by this remark of course, is that He will not allow us to continue sitting on it.

 


Homosexualtiy - Signs of Messianic Era (Derek Prince)

 

Update report (17/01/09):

Twelve Church of Scotland ministers and elders are trying to block the appointment of a gay minister in Aberdeen, it emerged last night.

They object to the decision to instal Scott Rennie at Queen’s Cross Church because they do not approve of his lifestyle.

The Aberdeen Presbytery members, who include ministers Louis Kinsey of St Columba's at Bridge of Don, Peter Dickson of High Holburn, Hugh Wallace of Newhills and Nigel Parker of Bucksburn Stoneywood, have signed a letter of protest to Kirk’s HQ in Edinburgh.

Prof Trevor Salmon, Queen’s Cross joint session clerk, said members, office-bearers and Mr Rennie are “dismayed” by the protest and branded the dissenters “small-minded”. A Kirk spokesman confirmed an appeal has been lodged against Mr Rennie’s appointment.

If the complaint is upheld, it will be referred to the Kirk’s General Assembly in May.

Aberdeen-born Mr Rennie is separated from his wife, with whom he has a young daughter, and shares the manse with another man.

Read on in the  Press and Journal....

Footnote: The options which required consideration by those who are opposed to the proposal were to either appeal against it (which is now the chosen course of action) or alternatively put a petition to the General Assembly in May. There were (are) pros and cons in terms of due process; and whether the issue would be addressed as being particular to the present case, or in general relating to the wider principles involved.



Christians Together, 09/01/2009

Feedback: (page   1   2   3   4   5   6)
Peter Carr12/05/2009, 08:24
Beth said, "There is something wrong here and somebody needs to put the finger on it! ASAP"

God's word has already put His finger on it...

...Jeremiah 17:9 (New International Version)

9 The heart is deceitful above all things
and beyond cure.
Who can understand it?
Andrea Mac12/05/2009, 09:58
Beth,

I think you misunderstood my post. I am agreeing with you!

I agree that this man is being hypocritical in living the life he is while trying to preach from a Bible which condemns him outright.

The point I was making was that his personal situation before God is for him alone to face and I can't see how he has any defence when God has clearly said "No" to this kind of relationship. What I see this petition to be addressing is the general issue of what our Church accepts as being at the core of our beliefs and I don't want it to be condoning something which God has condemned because then it has changed the very essence of why we believe what we do and is changing the truth of the Bible into a lie.
Beth (Guest)12/05/2009, 11:05
Sorry Andrea, now that I have had some sleep I see clearer what you are saying.

A friend of mine said this: A woman wants to join a golf club so she finds one and joins knowing that she can only play Mondays and Tuesdays although Wednesday and Thursday are Ladies Days. Once in the Club she goes about changing the rules to suit herself. This is what he is doing to The Church of Scotland and what a lot of the 'welcome to the 21st centuary people' dont seem to understand.

Fine, he wants to do what he is doing - well go and form your own gay organisation/church, leave our organisation alone, its been through enough disruption.

What worries me is that the C of S will be too scared of an unfair dismissal case (which would perhaps bankrupt them?) and let it go through without thinking the consequence. Do they really think that this will attract people (especially gay people) to join/worship? I dont think so,
Really he has put the C of S in a corner in a no win situation Has any one been on the OneKirk website and seen the ridiculous report about the statistics from the petition? Grasping at straws I think.

I just cannot believe that this is happening, that the 'high heed yins' have let it come to this.
Andrea Mac12/05/2009, 13:28
Absolutely.

All the previou occasions when the CofS should have been stating their position on these isues, they sat on the fence and tried to be all things to all people. This is where it has got us. Whatever the rights and wrongs of the Catholic church, at least they know what they believe and have the courage of their convictions to reinforce it when challenged. I admire them for this.

The example you give above is exactly what is happening. I also agree that if others want to belong to a church which supports all the things that the Bible condemns, they they should form their own organisation rather than trying to disrupt those who don't agree with the practices they want to indulge in.
Peter Carr12/05/2009, 14:11
Andrea said, "...they should form their own organisation rather than trying to disrupt those who don't agree with the practices they want to indulge in."


Maybe not Andrea...


1 Cor 11:18-19 (New International Version)
"In the first place, I hear that when you come together as a church, there are divisions among you, and to some extent I believe it. No doubt there have to be differences among you to show which of you have God's approval."
Bill Macd (Guest)12/05/2009, 15:09
I am broadly in agreement with both Beth and Andrea. Scott knew the position he would put the Church in at the outset by highlighting his intention to have David in the manse. I, having attended Queen's Cross Church for many years, have heard him preach and indeed he has much to offer, in my opinion BUT he is prepared to blow the Church, as we know it, apart, to further acceptance of his cause. Not a Christian stance. The very emphisis placed on his partnership was there to cause division and disruption within the Church. I voted with my feet and moved to another Kirk, with a very heavy heart. I do realise the pressure Queen's Cross are under when I hear the Session Clerk refer to the Church as a 'Music Hall' with differing acts to accomodate all people, when asked his views.
John Parker (Guest)12/05/2009, 18:11
It is a very common tactic, whether it is gays, pro-abortionists or those who support euthanasia. They try to effect (force) a change in the law by putting up a situation for which humanists etc. would have a strong sympathy; hoping a decision in their favour and accordinbly create precedent.

The Church of Scotland has brought this on itself by trying to be all things to all men. But having said that if it wasn't happening to the C of S it would be happening to some other organisation.

My Bible tells me that this is what we should expect as the day of the Lord draws ever nearer.
Peter Carr12/05/2009, 19:13
I agree John, and there have been warnings for some time of anti-Christian organisations trying to bring about change from within, to subvert the true Gospel. It was around in Paul's day, and is undoubtedly around today!
Jonathan (Guest)16/06/2009, 20:46
Scott Renie states:
"I hope the General Assembly's decision [effectively endorsing homosexuality] will strengthen many people who are gay and lesbian in the church.”

I ask - could anyone who believes the Bible to be God’s word, ask for strengthening in an activity condemned in the Bible? Doubtless, such practices were part of life in Sodom, with Romans 1 describing men abandoning the natural function of women and burning in their desire toward one another, and similarly women with women. This is described as “error”, and it is described as part of a downward spiral away from living in full reverence and thankfulness to God. Indeed, if God made an example of Sodom as a warning to future generations, what grounds are there for not applying the warning to our own generation? To continue in such activity is like thanking God for the pleasures of sin (which the Bible acknowledges “last for a season”) and wanting His blessing in continuing to enjoy sin.

Does such action not display disregard for the fact that sin cost our Saviour His life?
Alan18/06/2009, 10:05
Jonathan, you are correct in what you say and God will judge this situation and all those involved will pay a price for their endorsement or be blessed for their opposition.

However, just like the conversation with God and Abraham, "Will You indeed sweep away the righteous with the wicked? "

God will spare the church and the nation from judgement purely on the principle that he agreed with Abraham.

"If I find in Sodom fifty righteous within the city, then I will spare the whole place on their account."

Of course that number went down to 10. The numbers are academic I think but the principle is correct.

Jesus knows the time alloted for judgement approaches and that is why we are told -

"All the nations will be gathered before Him; and He will separate them from one another, as the shepherd separates the sheep from the goats; "

The gay lobby in the church think they have a victory on their hands but in actual fact they are destroying the church's authority on sin.

I'd say to anyone who is a Minister in the church - break away. Any God fearing members of the church who are in a church who will not break away - leave because you wont change a thing from the pews and God wants you to grow in a church that really preaches the truth.
(page   1   2   3   4   5   6)

Christians Together in the Highlands and Islands > Christian Life > Current News > A gay minister for Queen's Cross Church